Thumbs Down to the Texas legislators who enacted a broad and hopelessly confusing conflict-of-interest law last year to supposedly restrict public officials from voting on zoning, purchasing or tax issues from which they or their relatives might benefit. A year in prison is the maximum penalty for knowingly voting on an issue that they or their relatives -including everyone from children to nephews-in-law-are too involved in. (They are too involved in an issue if it affects a business in which they own at least 10 percent of the stock or have invested $2,500 or more, or from which they receive 10 percent of their income.) This law has several flaws. First, the definition of a public official is far-reaching. Second, as City Council member Annette Strauss put it, “I don’t know what kind of property my relatives own, and I couldn’t very well ask them.” Third, where do personal friends fall in an official’s sphere of influence?
Get our weekly recap
Brings new meaning to the phrase Sunday Funday. No spam, ever.
Related Articles
Arts & Entertainment
DIFF Documentary City of Hate Reframes JFK’s Assassination Alongside Modern Dallas
Documentarian Quin Mathews revisited the topic in the wake of a number of tragedies that shared North Texas as their center.
By Austin Zook
Business
How Plug and Play in Frisco and McKinney Is Connecting DFW to a Global Innovation Circuit
The global innovation platform headquartered in Silicon Valley has launched accelerator programs in North Texas focused on sports tech, fintech and AI.
Arts & Entertainment
‘The Trouble is You Think You Have Time’: Paul Levatino on Bastards of Soul
A Q&A with the music-industry veteran and first-time feature director about his new documentary and the loss of a friend.
By Zac Crain