The State Fair still weighs its coupons to figure out how much money it makes. Greasy coupons weigh more. Bret Redman

State Fair of Texas

Dallas Has Business to Settle with the State Fair of Texas

Fair Park would be in much better shape had the State Fair actually lived-up to the terms of its contract with the city

I’m going to steal and modify a metaphor that Jim Schutze uses in his column today about the latest shenanigans involving Fair Park and the State Fair of Texas:

Imagine you own a business and you rent an office in a building. Every month you pay rent, and the cost of that rent includes a portion of the building’s overall common area operating expenses, a pretty standard condition in commercial office leases. But what if you decide you didn’t want to pay your portion of the operating expenses? What if, in fact, over the course of a ten-year lease, you never paid those operating expenses? What do you think the landlord would do?

Simple: you’d get kicked out of your space — and probably a lot sooner than the time it took to rack up ten years-worth of unpaid rent. And after you got evicted, you’d probably get sued by the landlord, who, understandably, would want the back rent you failed to pay as part of the terms of the lease.

Now let’s translate that situation to Fair Park and the State Fair. Per the 2003 contract the State Fair signed with the city of Dallas, which still owns Fair Park (even though the city is planning on handing the park’s operations over to a private entity), the State Fair is obligated to share a portion of its profits to fund the upkeep and continued maintenance of Fair Park’s historical buildings and grounds. Think of it as the State Fair’s common area operating expense. When the city negotiated its contract with the fair, it asked the fair to spend money on keeping up the historic campus. The State Fair agreed that that seemed fair enough, and signed the contract.

However, for 14 years, the State Fair has managed to avoid paying the maintenance cost. How could that happen? Robert Wilonsky had a column over the weekend that goes into the messy details, which essentially boil down to the fair’s usual obfuscation and its good ol’ boy relationship to the city.

Schutze takes it from there, and writes that what may be even more depressing than the fact that the State Fair should have contributed as much as $100 million over the past decade to the upkeep of Fair Park’s art deco buildings is the fact that city officials have struck a new deal with the fair that turns a blind eye to that history of negligence. Instead, the fair says it will start to contribute some money for improvements in the park out of a fund it will continue to control. City staff sees this as a win, the pauper at the gate finally getting the local baron to drop some shillings into his tin cup (with the baron then telling the pauper how to spend them).

It isn’t really news that the State Fair has walked all over — and continues to walk all over — the city. This all came up last year when the city was trying to hand over the keys to Fair Park to a private entity headed by former-Hunt Oil chairman Walt Humann. But here’s what really gets me.

Last year, during that debate, Humann and his backers on the council said again and again that the reason Fair Park was in such bad shape was that the city had failed to invest sufficiently in the maintenance and upkeep of the park. In fact, Humann’s plan called for the city to increase the amount of tax dollars spent on the park each year, as well as to kick in more millions via the upcoming bond election — a bond election that will ask residents to approve perhaps as much as a $1 billion just to maintain all the other needs — from streets to cultural facilities —  the city can’t afford to keep up.

During these reprimands of the city’s neglect of Fair Park, the tone was admonishing, at times almost penitential. The city had been a bad boy, and it was time to receive its fiscal punishment. As for the State Fair? There wasn’t much to talk about there. They had a contract and that contract was nonnegotiable. But maybe we could ask them nicely to be a  better tenant.

This attitude — that the city of Dallas is a petulant little child, that it lacks a basic capacity to meets its many obligations — floats around a lot in this city, and it often surfaces in the conversations surrounding major projects and issues, from Trinity River to DART. It is an attitude that casts city governance as an impediment to progress or as the source of Dallas’ woes. Great things for Dallas can only happen when the city cedes its control of all the responsibilities it obviously can’t handle to private entities — the adults in the room. Whether it is building a toll road in the floodway or blindly tying the future of a DART to a billion dollar investment in a failed transit strategy, the city is told that its role is to get out of the way and let the mature adults handle matters. Then, those adults run hog wild with Dallas’ residents tax dollars.

To be fair, as Schutze’s column points out, often its the city and city staff that help perpetuate this adolescent persona. City staff has somehow talked itself into a position in which forgiving a decade worth of the State Fair’s back rent is seen as a win for the city. The deal staff has worked out with the State Fair shows city staff negotiating from a position of cowardice, which is somewhat understandable. The State Fair, after all, is headed by some of the most powerful and influential people in this city. Perhaps more significantly, the power of the State Fair is buttressed by public opinion. You can see it whenever it is suggested that the city change the rules about how the State Fair operates in Fair Park. The comments to the posts fill up with angry fairgoers who fear that somehow their beloved fair is being monkeyed with.

But this cowardice is not a failure of the institution of local government, nor is it indicative of that government’s shortcomings. It is simply an indication of the lack of conviction in our local leadership — a lack of conviction that stems from the tendency among some of our elected public officials to discount or dismiss the value and role of the very municipal governments or governmental bodies which they lead. If the city is often seen as a child — that it can’t handle the responsibilities of managing itself — it is because the public officials we have elected to run the city act like children who shirk those responsibilities.

However, this doesn’t have to be the case this time. This latest situation in Fair Park is about as cut and dry as its gets. No one is saying right now that the fair needs to change, or reduce its footprint, or move. Rather, it has come to light that the State Fair has failed to follow through on its obligations to the terms of its contract contract with the city. As a result, Fair Park, which should be the crown jewel in city’s park system, is quickly rotting-out before our eyes.

The State Fair should pay its back rent. It’s that’s simple. And if it doesn’t, the city should tear up the contract and start the negotiations afresh.


Get a weekly recap in your inbox every Sunday of our best stories from the week plus a primer for the days ahead.

Find It

Search our directories for...









View All

View All


  • Poetaster Dallas

    ( with apologies to Frank Loesser)

    It says here:
    The average city resident
    Basically ignorant
    With jobs and family and work
    A life unextravagant
    Has little time or desire for city politics

    In other words, by just busily working hard to pay their taxes
    The budget, can get out of control.

    You can scrape it down to the basics thinking that’s all
    You can take it down, causing a frown on the DCC cabal
    If you’re serious and want tax relief, best to limit the sprawl
    The budget, can get out of control.

    It says here:
    Fair Park plan, needing a billion
    With it’s deets unknown
    Gifted to a resident of Highland Park, see note from Mayor (looks at note)
    And strikes the funny bone
    We’d laugh all the way to the bank, if it didn’t hurt!

    In other words, finding money to fix Fair Park takes the “right person”
    The budget, Oy! I need a stiff drink!.

    Amazing that the buildings have gotten to such bad shape
    And now it apparently just requires a man with savior’s cape
    Never mind if it’s Dallas’ bank accounts they do rape
    The budget, Oy! I need a stiff drink!

    .And further more, projects needing millions, and millions
    Like parking for Klyde Warren Park
    The budget, can go into the red.

    When they get down to talking the basics
    Like police, fire, libraries and streets
    While living in a house on Rick’s Circle
    Who cares about the balance sheets?
    Then they wonder why everyone thinks they are cheats!
    The city, could face bankruptcy
    City council unanxiously
    And almost absently
    Unabashedly, morally

    I feel sick.

  • Mavdog

    A prudent landlord puts their tenant in default what the tenant does not fulfill its obligations under the lease.
    The City of Dallas should notify SFOT they are in default if such can be seen as having occurred. The sooner the better.

  • OldLakeHighlander

    Rawlings and the boys obviously graduated with top honors from Hedley Lamar’s Institute of Land Snatching

  • Jim Schutze

    Really good point on the reflexive tendency of the Citizens Council types to be derisive about local government, which they never have trusted since the courts forced them to allow black people to get elected. Isn’t it ironic that this belief then enables them morally to steal from it.

  • Stephonz

    Move that StateFair to Arlington if they plan on not maintaining that Fair Park. Skipping paying your bills because you are friends with the oligarchs of Dallas..

  • Greg Brown

    Yes they are! Into the pockets of the board members and their lackeys. Hence the reason why they refuse to share their books.

  • Emme Anais

    Sad state of something we take so much pride in, any fair goer sees the condition of the wonderful buildings and grounds and be mad at the city but that anger is misplaced and should be at ourselves it’s our city and only we can bring about change by getting rid of the good’ol boy system that is ruining an awesome and beautiful city rite before our eyes.