In Search of Dallas’ Missing Alcohol Sales Tax Revenue

Did the DCVB stage a heist?

It’s been fun listening to the budget debates over the last couple of weeks: Mayor Rawlings, Lee Kleinman, Jennifer Staubach Gates, Scott Griggs, Rickey D. Callahan, and Philip Kingston politely asking for some minor (less than 1%) tweaks to the budget — and City Manager A.C. Gonzalez responding by threatening to burn the place to the ground.

One thing that never came up, however, was the city’s new mixed beverage sales tax. What’s that? You haven’t heard of it? Well, you’re not alone. I can find no mention of it in either the city’s 2014 audited financial statements or 2016 budget. I also can’t find any record of the City Council ever having been briefed on the matter, notwithstanding the fact the State of Texas is telling us they’ve sent us $8,410,145.63 as our cut, just in the first year-and-a-half. Going back through the financials, I did find something with a similar description, an “alcohol beverage tax.” And wow, look at that: up 52% since 2012!

Screen Shot 2015-09-05 at 11.51.49 AM

Once fully implemented (FY 2014 only reflected 9 months’ worth of the new collections), $3 million-$4 million per year in new money will be dropping into the city’s lap, money that could help address funding shortfalls at the libraries and Department of Animal Services. Time to check the budget, and, here we go, right here on p. 353:

Screen Shot 2015-09-05 at 12.21.09 PM

Rats! The freakin’ money-losing convention center somehow snagged it. But how? I don’t remember the City Council voting to surrender our rights to this money to the free-spending, under-performing Dallas Convention & Visitors Bureau.

Luckily I remembered hearing something about it at the staff briefing delivered to the City Council’s Economic Development Committee on August 17:

Screen Shot 2015-09-05 at 12.45.00 PM

So there you have it. In addition to the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center/DCVB collectively sucking up 100% of the hotel occupancy tax and nearly 100% of the Tourism Public Improvement District‘s projected $56 million in gross revenues, guess they managed to get 100% of the alcohol beverage tax as well.

And that settles that. Except…let me pull out my copy of the bond docs, just to double-check, on p.22.

Screen Shot 2015-09-05 at 1.06.59 PM

Wait a second. There are two alcohol beverage taxes received by the city: a mixed beverage gross receipts tax, and a mixed beverage sales tax. According to the bond docs, only the first is pledged to the convention center. Yet, somehow, all of the revenues associated with this second, new tax are being handed over to the convention center as well.

When and how was this authorized?


Get a weekly recap in your inbox every Sunday of our best stories from the week plus a primer for the days ahead.

Find It

Search our directories for...









View All

View All


  • Mavdog

    As Sherlock Holmes was fond of saying, “The game’s afoot!”.

    You have discovered and exposed the deed, the question is who was culpable in its happening.

  • trek1red

    The alcohol beverage taxes were pledged to the convention center back in the 1990’s to cover the last expansion. I am guessing that the city just took the extra money from the new tax and automatically transferred to the convention center without asking for approval. Don’t ask, don’t tell. Before the 1990’s, all that money went to the General Fund.

  • Brenda Marks

    Here’s hoping Craig Kinton will read this and send out his request for documents.

  • Regina Imburgia

    WOW Good work!! Now this is investigative journalism…refreshing!

  • MattL1

    Don’t worry. I’m sure the Convention Center folks have been using, and will continue to use, the money wisely.

  • BacchusPlateau

    Next up for investigation : how gambling revenues were supposed to fund Texas education and reduce property taxes.

  • Eric Foster

    CVB expenses cover a lot of really nice food and beverage events where city staffers can ‘drop by’ and partake. Plus a lot of ‘site inspection’ traveling by CVB and city staffers to exotic Ports O’ Call.

  • Amy S

    From everything I’ve read, the state was the recipient of the increased total liquor taxes (14% vs. 14.95% (8.25+6.7), this wasn’t passed through to the cities. Here is the final fiscal analysis conducted by the Comptroller’s office prior to HB 3572 passage.

    • Wylie H Dallas

      The city receives a cut equal to 10.7143% of gross collections pursuant to the Texas Tax Code.