Streetcars on Elm Street in the 1920s Dallas Public Library

Urban Design

Dallas Public Transit Was Better in 1919 Than It Is In 2019, Cont’d

Adding to a post from last week only shows what we've lost in the past century.

Last week, Peter wrote about a rendering by the New York-based artist Jake Berman of our expansive streetcar network as it existed in 1919. It took you all over the city—East Dallas to Winnetka Heights, Fair Park to Oak Lawn, Highland Park to North Oak Cliff. The piece was popular on Reddit, and there have been subsequent requests for Berman to create another map showing the existing DART light rail system to compare it with. (And, yes, don’t come for us Redditors, we got permission from Berman to use this.)

It will make you sad.

On the left is the 1919 map, with the dense streetcar network. On the right is what we have now, the DART rail in white and the minor streetcar lines in North Oak Cliff and Uptown in yellow. You’ll see that many of the interior neighborhoods are left unserved by any type of rail, despite there having been tracks through them a full generation before. It’s not DART’s fault, either. They weren’t the ones who put in the freeway system that separated neighborhoods from one another. But it does show how priorities of transit planners changed over the course of a generation. As Peter noted in his column that went online today, the region more than doubled in population over the last 40 years. The city of Dallas has only gained 440,000 new residents. That’s a sign of how well sprawl has worked, and public transit followed a similar formula to our highways.

DART built along freight lines, which created a network that stretches 93 miles across the region. It is inefficient to use within the city itself, but it’s a dream if you’re looking to get to escape the city center without using your car. And, sure, we don’t know frequency from back then and it’s not clear how reliable the trains were. But the layout reveals a hope that it wasn’t always like how it is.

Newsletter

Get a weekly recap in your inbox every Sunday of our best stories from the week plus a primer for the days ahead.

Find It

Search our directories for...

Dining

Dining

Bars

Bars

Events

Events

Attractions

Attractions

View All

View All

Comments

  • Mavdog

    In all fairness the bus lines should be included. The buses are what took the place of the streetcars, not the rail system.

    • PeterTx52

      and buses are much more flexible in being able to change their routes as demand changes

  • trek1red

    Also, the bridge for the street cars over the Trinity was wood and scary to ride according to accounts from old timers who used the service.

  • PeterTx52

    sprawl is a result of the middle class gaining independence from the bus and rail system via the arrival of the automobile. Such mobility allowed them to head to the country aka suburbs where they could gain space.. Those that keep pushing for rail systems would prefer that we all live cheek to jowl like they do in say NYC

    • Bernard Finucane

      Sprawl is the result of massive subsidies to suburban infrastructure that will never pay for itself and is decaying even as it it is being expanded.

  • PeterTx52

    one should look at DART as if it is the modern day version of the interurban.

  • Cole Daugherty

    Your headline states that public transit was better 100 years ago without discussing buses. The bus system is critical to navigating around town today. See below link for a complete map at all DART modes: https://www.dart.org/maps/pdfmaps/DARTSystemMap27aug18.pdf