Justin with his wife, Chasity, and kiddos Maya and Alexander (photo courtesy Justin Henry)


What Justin Henry’s Election Means for DISD

This is good news for the district and the entire city.

Tomorrow, the Dallas ISD school board meets for the first time since Justin Henry defeated longtime trustee Bernadette Nutall for the District 9 seat. Late Saturday evening, my phone was blowing up with joyful texts, emojis, Bitmojis, and GIFs. Why? Partly because people are very happy Nutall is gone. She was a divisive trustee who formed — with Audrey Pinkerton, Joyce Foreman, and Lew Blackburn — a strong status-quo bloc on the board, one that cloaked itself in the language of fiscal responsibility but that really worked for special interests unrelated to student outcomes. That’s why many see Henry’s election as a catalytic event, one that is sure to help kids in the short and long terms.

I should point out that Henry is no yes man. From the time I met him years ago, to the point at which I heard his shaky voice deliver the first draft of his stump speech in his campaign manager’s living room, all the way up to election night, he has been a thoughtful and independent candidate. Henry has spent years thinking about the best policy for kids, debating policy questions with people from all sides of the education table. He has come to his conclusions organically. Anyone, even his allies, who thinks otherwise will be in for a unpleasant surprise.

That said, here are a few predictions about the ways in which Henry’s election will change the board dynamics:

The TRE vote. Corbett Smith’s story linked above and this Dallas Morning News editorial lay out pretty clearly that Henry’s inclusion is likely to give the pro-TRE bloc the super majority it needs to send the question to voters and let them decide whether they want to increase taxes to pay for new programs. But it goes deeper than that. Up until Saturday night, DISD officials had been working on a TRE proposal that made concessions specifically to Audrey Pinkerton, the Oak Cliff trustee who was too busy stargazing — literally — to attend the previous TRE vote. (She would have voted against it, but that way she didn’t have to go on record as voting against it.) Now that version was scrapped and one of the previously submitted plans — you know, the one that all along officials believed was best for the district and for kids — will most likely be voted on in August. (The budget vote tomorrow will assume an upcoming TRE.) It will be up to voters to pass it in November, which is no guarantee given the nutjobs who will come out against it. But at least it puts that decision in the hands of voters, as it should be.

A comprehensive equity policy. Nutall chaired the board’s racial equity committee but never worked to produce a serious racial equity policy. Anything productive would detract from her continuing message of division, much to the off-the-record disappointment of committee members. With Henry onboard, the district will once again take seriously the important task of producing a comprehensive racial equity policy.

Continued expansion of early childhood programs. This was a key point of emphasis in Henry’s campaign, that we can’t lose the momentum gained by the district’s early education progress in the past few years. With the hopeful passage of a TRE in November, there will be money to match the programmatic support.

Thoughtful refinement of TEI. The teacher evaluation system has been a success overall, driving out the worst teachers and identifying (and rewarding) some of the district’s best teachers. But even its supporters have acknowledged it needs refinement. Too many good teachers still aren’t being rewarded properly by its metrics. But trustees were reluctant to make big changes because that opened the window for status quo trustees to gut or eliminate TEI. Now they have the votes to protect the system overall, but work to make it more fair going forward.

Modeling effective leadership. This is going to be Henry’s biggest challenge. For decades, special-interest-led trustees have used the board as a place to grandstand, suggesting to constituents that opposition was in and of itself a worthwhile goal. This is goes back to Harryette Ehrhardt and Ron Price and continued through Elizabeth Jones and the current status-quo bloc. The younger group of school leaders — Henry, Miguel Solis, and Jaime Resendez are all in their 30s — are laser focused on improving student outcomes, the one goal of a trustee that should supersede all others. This means not only will more good work for kids get done, but when Henry disagrees with the board, he will actually be taken seriously, because other board members will trust that it’s honest debate, not a power play. The winners will be students and District 9 constituents — and, come to think of it, all of Dallas.


Get a weekly recap in your inbox every Sunday of our best stories from the week plus a primer for the days ahead.

Find It

Search our directories for...









View All

View All


  • Los_Politico

    Congrats Justin! Now enroll your kid in DISD in August.

  • bbetzen

    While I have supported those trustees speaking out against the TRE, I have listened to their reasoning, which Dallas cannot ignore. They are very concerned about how money is being spent, both from the viewpoint of waste and from the issue of racial equity.

    While I believe the TRE is needed, the issue of monetary waste and racial equity must NOT be ignored in this election. DISD needs significantly higher levels of transparency so as to verify that the concerns of Trustees not supporting the TRE are addressed. We would all benefit from that attention!

    DISD must achieve a significantly greater level of transparency before the TRE is voted on by the people of Dallas.

    At the current time the information about DISD schools is fragmented among multiple charts and locations online. The Dallas NAACP and Our Community Our Schools have voted to support the unification of the most critical of this data into the creation of one spreadsheet by DISD. It would be a large spreadsheet pulling together the most critical information about each DISD school onto one Excel spreadsheet.

    The spreadsheet would be large: one row for every one of the 228 or so schools operating in DISD each year and over 200 columns of data about each of these schools. The spreadsheet would be a goldmine for any parent wanting to explore DISD schools for their child. It would include school identifying data, capacity, enrollment, building condition, student achievement data, student and teacher demographics, teacher experience levels, and similar data considered to be most important by parents. It would also include the 32 per-student financial allocations that are given each school for funding as found in the PEIMS Financial Standard Reports.

    Such a spreadsheet would continue to evolve over time to include the most valuable data demanded by the public. This would be an annual spreadsheet covering the operations of DISD for one school year. A ten year history of 10 such spreadsheets would be created to show the Dallas public the recent history of DISD.

    This increased transparency would hopefully be available to the public long before the TRE election in November so that no anti-tax group could use it as ammunition, alleging secrecy, to help defeat the badly needed funds for DISD.

    Instead, this increased transparency would reflect the belief of DISD in full transparency, and ever greater citizen involvement, to accelerate the work of building the greatest urban school district in the nation!