Dallas Ranked Dead Last in Study of Economic Inclusivity

You've heard this one before, but a new report shows again just how bad economic inequality is in Dallas.

Pounding yet another beat on the “Dallas is a woefully unequal place segregated by race and income” drum, here’s a new study from the Urban Institute that ranks the city dead last in an index of overall economic and racial inclusion.

The report, “Inclusive Recovery in U.S. Cities,” looks at how the 274 largest cities in the country recovered from economic downturns between 1980 and 2013. Researchers measured economic trends in each city, as well as data on income segregation, housing affordability, job availability, and racial disparities applying to all of the above. They found that while the ten cities doing best on their inclusion metrics also had a healthy economic outlook, “economic growth does not automatically lead to inclusion.”

A city’s economic success does not necessarily affect all of its residents. That’s why Dallas, bristling with shiny new development in a metropolitan region overflowing with jobs, can fare well on so many economic measures while leaving so many people, most of them black or brown and living in the southern half of the city, behind. This is basically another example of how, in Dallas, opportunity is limited to people living in wealthier neighborhoods, a problem illustrated locally by the group Opportunity Dallas. Economic growth by itself is not enough, the report concludes. Targeted, deliberate policy is necessary to ensure that a rising tide actually does lift all boats.

Via the Urban Institute. Click image to enlarge.


  • RompingWillyBilly

    It is easy to be an accuser. Take for example the accepted paradigm regarding the issue of “color.” The age old argument that has always been made is children have to be taught to be prejudice by their parents. The argument isn’t that it is wrong for parents to teach their children emphasis on teach, but that the children have been misguided. That the process of teaching is imperfect. This doesn’t mean that the accusers belittling the accused possess the tight way to teach children pertaining to what is the correct paradigm pertaining to color. They don’t. Indeed, while the “accused” has missed the mark pertaining to what is the correct process to teach our children pertaining to the theory of color, the “accuser” has no idea one way or the other. They stand as accusers without any valid alternate teaching. Indeed, they were born virtuous and innocent children needing no instruction.