Politics & Government

A Few More Words About Yesterday’s City Council DART Resolution

Council members Lee Kleinman and Carolyn King Arnold did NOT have their finest day.

Councilman Kleinman is ready to rumble.
Councilman Kleinman is ready to rumble.

For a thorough explanation of why yesterday’s City Council resolution about DART’s priorities was a big deal, read what Peter Simek posted. Here I’d just like to point out the two council members who I thought performed the worst yesterday.

First up is District 4’s representative, Carolyn King Arnold. She was so far over her ski tips yesterday that I almost feel sorry for her. Take the time to appreciate how confused she was. It’s just four minutes. Go to the video here, and cue it up to the 94:00 minute mark. Watch till 97:53. That’s all you need to know. After learning that about half of DART’s funding comes from Dallas, the city whose council she sits on, and that the citizens voted on that funding, Arnold goes on to ask the city attorney about the feasibility of Dallas’ pulling out of Dallas Area Rapid Transit (requires changing state law) or, more reasonably (but impossibly), withholding half of the 1 percent of our sales tax that we give to DART so that we can use it for “another service.” Arnold works hard for her constituents. It’s just that she’s working hard to get a basic understanding of a topic that nearly everyone else in the room already has.

Next up is potty-mouthed Lee Kleinman, District 11’s rep. Kleinman is a bit more dangerous than Arnold because he has an MBA in finance, as he reminded everyone in yesterday’s meeting, and because he knows how to peer over his glasses at people. Also, some of what he says at first sounds like it makes sense — until you figure out that he’s working at a higher level than Arnold and therefore making even bigger mistakes.

Again, I need you to watch some video. Go to the 58:30 mark and watch till 60:45. Come on. That’s 2 minutes of your day. In that brief clip, you will see Kleinman say some amazing things about how DART funds construction and about how certain people aren’t smart enough to understand what he’s talking about. Actually, he delivers one hell of a burn.

Speaking hypothetically, he says, “DART failing financially is, no question, problematic.” Probably only Councilwoman Arnold would disagree. But then he says he has challenged the Coalition for a New Dallas to explain how DART’s paying for the northern Cotton Belt Line could put in jeopardy its ability to afford an underground route for D2 (the second, much-needed downtown line). (Disclosure: the Coalition was co-founded by Wick Allison, who owns D Magazine.) Kleinman implies that the Coalition has not risen to this challenge and then explains how DART can afford both projects. First, it will refinance debt. And, second, “a new program has become available.” This is huge. Where DART has previously relied on funds from the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA), it has now found a new program, this one run by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA).

So, if you’re not paying close attention, it sounds like DART has a second source of federal money to pay for construction. Which is true — and very wrong.

The FTA money that DART is after is a grant. It hopes the feds give money to DART. But this is a competitive process, and the bucket of money is only so deep for competing agencies around the country. The FTA gives money to a project only if gets people out of cars and riding trains and lessening highway traffic and improving air quality. If the project doesn’t do that stuff, no free money. That’s why the FTA won’t give any money to the Cotton Belt.

The FRA and the new program Kleinman has identified? It’s called the Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing program. Catch that last word? Financing? Under this program, the FRA would loan money to DART. That means debt, and more debt would hurt DART’s position with the FTA, the agency that grants money. The FTA doesn’t like to give money to agencies that are burdened by too much debt.

You see how that works? I know it’s a lot of initialisms. But just remember: free money vs. debt. That’s what Kleinman conflates. Then he puts a cherry on top by insulting the executive director of the Coalition for a New Dallas. His name is Matt Tranchin. You’ll notice, right at the end of that Kleinman clip, at the 60:20 mark, he says: “I gotta say, when someone comes up here and they say they’re an intern in D.C., that hardly qualifies them as an expert in transportation or in finance.”

That, my friends, was the aforementioned burn. Tranchin spoke to the Council about an hour earlier. Watch his 3-minute speech at the 4:45 mark. Decide for yourself if he makes sense. Ignore his haircut. Tranchin mentions that he “worked for a few years in D.C.” Kleinman snatched up that tidbit and ran with it, turning him into an intern. Like I say, total burn.

For the record, Tranchin worked in the White House, overseeing the Obama administration’s outreach to nonprofits, connecting them with federal grants. He served in the Office of Public Engagement. And he was paid to do it.

At the conclusion of yesterday’s Council meeting, after the Council had voted unanimously on a resolution that very pointedly did not mention the Cotton Belt Line and very specifically did mention building D2 as a subway, Councilwoman Sandy Greyson, District 12, asked the mayor if someone from the Coalition could respond to the points that Kleinman had tried to make. The mayor said nope, they were too busy. Matt Tranchin was denied his chance to respond to Kleinman’s burn. So I’m going to give him that opportunity here. I asked him to write his response as if he were addressing the Council. Here’s what he would have said:

“Mr. Mayor, thank you for giving me the opportunity to respond. As the executive director of the Coalition for a New Dallas, I was unaware that Councilman Kleinman had issued a challenge to the Coalition to address the problems with DART’s proposed financial plan. We gladly accept the challenge on the condition that our conversation is open to the public so that they, too, can be educated about the risks that the Cotton Belt poses to the D2 subway.

“But I’d also like to take a moment and address Councilman Kleinman’s ‘intern’ comment. Clearly, that was meant to diminish me. It’s unfortunate, but in today’s political climate, we’ve become desensitized to politicians insulting one another. But it’s a sad reflection on the culture of Dallas City Hall when residents find themselves targeted by our elected officials at public forums. Robert Moses once famously diminished Jane Jacobs by calling her a ‘housewife.’ Now, I’m no Jane Jacobs — that would be our very own Patrick Kennedy. But we don’t need a Robert Moses in Dallas. And we certainly don’t need any more bullies in politics. As a future president of the United States is fond of saying, ‘When they go low, we go high.’ So with that, I’d like to thank the Council for unanimously supporting the D2 subway and emphatically rejecting the Cotton Belt as a priority for our city.”


Get a weekly recap in your inbox every Sunday of our best stories from the week plus a primer for the days ahead.

Find It

Search our directories for...









View All

View All


  • EricCeleste

    Question only related to that picture: Do you think he’s ever mansplained? I’ll hang up and listen.

  • OldLakeHighlander

    Kleinman obviously promised something to someone up in the North 40 that that he could not keep. Given his bitterness, one has to assume money or a cushy job is in the balance.

  • topham

    Tranchin did an excellent job of explaining a very short time.

    Of course FTA is far less likely to give DART money for D2 if DART’s debt balloons by 375% over what it was when DART originally requested the money. That’s how much DART would need to borrow for Cotton Belt.

    It’s unconscionable for Kleinman to belittle one citizen whom Kleinman ostensibly serves. It’s even more shameful (maybe) for Kleinman to mislead every citizen about the consequences of DART’s borrowing for Cotton Belt.

    • Patrick Kennedy

      Correct. And while the RRIF loan provides excellent borrowing rates what good does that low rate do if all future borrowing is increased because of it?

  • JoeBl

    This is how old Dallas did things. Screw everything but Dallas. D Magazine, and the Observer care nothing about anything north of 635.

    • Thank you for your comment.

      In the November issue of the magazine, I interviewed Frisco Mayor Maher Maso. Smart guy. Loved talking to him. Earlier this year, our City columnist, Eric Celeste, wrote a VERY flattering story about Plano. Here’s a link:


      Those are just the first to stories that come to mind, stuff centered north of 635. I could spend more time pointing out that you’re standing on shaky ground, but I think you get the point.

      Thing is, what’s good for Dallas is good for the region. Mayor Maso drove that point home with me. Frisco WANTS Dallas to thrive. For that to happen, we have to take care of the heart, downtown Dallas.

      Now then. What you said about the Observer is absolutely true. SCREW the Observer. Horrible, terrible, no good publication.

      • JoeBl

        “Thing is, what’s good for Dallas is good for the region.”

        Of course, that isn’t saying what is good for all cities is good for the region… just Dallas. That’s the old way.

        “I could spend more time pointing out that you’re standing on shaky ground, but I think you get the point.” Actually I don’t. Just doing a story isn’t what we are talking about. Where is the editorial that says “Well maybe Addison has a point?”

        • JOnD

          Ugh. Dude, ponder on why there is no pro teams named the Arlington Cowboys or FC Frisco.

          • JoeBl

            Ugh. Dude. Ponder why that isn’t relevant.

          • JOnD

            Okay, I will explain it to you. Generally, the area of North of 635 is vapid of any culture. It’s a land of chain stores, HOA’s, and nice schools. It’s not exactly a bubbling cauldron of creativity. I mean, there are some nice redesigned historic little downtown areas in some of the towns that are okay, if you like embroidered scarecrows and “bless this house” kind of decor. But the only thing that flows from the suburbs to Dallas is traffic and PAC money. So everything that occurs in whatever Pleasantville town you live in was made because somebody from Dallas started the process and all things cultural flowed from the central part of Dallas out to your area. Even your nicer restaurants, if they are not some national chain conglomerate, had their original start within the LBJ/635 corridor. You only have them because the owners realize how much money they could make off you and your helicopter-parented kids because you have way more disposable income in your $250,000 mass-produced McMansion on your subdivision cul-de-sac. So good for you! You made a great economic decision. And your kids will get a fine education without having to deal with those “other people.” They may even get to take field trips to such places as the Arboretum, Dallas Museum of Art, the Winspear, the Perot Museum, etc. and you might even get to go eat at the original Lockhart Smokehouse if you’re not too afraid of Oak Cliff. D magazine did a good article on the suburbs. But really, how much more than one article can you really write? I would love to make a list of all the interesting things to do in Dallas, but you can just click the search archive on the upper right.

          • C P

            Dude, that was awesome.

    • Jamesthelast

      Yeah, the old Dallas that built all those freeways that destroyed Dallas for the sake of the suburban commute clearly does not care about the suburbs.
      Also, it’s not Dallas fault that the north suburbs were dumb and didn’t build smart transit instead of highways everywhere.

      Do people like you realize that if DART was run like a good transit system instead of a vanity project for real estate owning class, they might actually be able to afford to built the Cotton Belt line later?

      • kduble

        Actually, the northern ‘burbs have done a better job of planning development around their rail stations than has Dallas.

    • C P

      You’re right, that is the wrong way to think.

      They shouldn’t care nothing about anything north of Mockingbird Lane.