How Accurate Was My Mavericks Prediction?

(credit: Flickr user Keith Allison)
(credit: Flickr user Keith Allison)
On October 29, the first day of the 2013-14 NBA season, I posted “A Blatantly Biased But, I Think, Mostly Clear-Eyed 2013-14 Dallas Mavericks Season Preview.” In it, I made six points. Let’s review them.

Dirk Nowitzki is back and looking like Dirk Nowitzki. “[D]o you really think he’s done? Here are the last two things to go: height and shooting. He’s got both. He might not be ‘put the team on his shoulders and win games singlehandedly with his insane, wrong-legged, crazy-high-arching fadeaway shot’ Dirk anymore, but he’s not terribly far off.” I was right and wrong about this. 1) He definitely is not done, just a few percentage points away from another 50/40/90 season. 2) There have been more than a few games where he absolutely was “put the team on his shoulder and win games singlehandedly with his insane, wrong-legged, crazy-high-arching fadeaway show” Dirk. I SEE YOU, BIG GERMAN.

Monta Ellis Will Enjoy Playing With Dirk, And You Will Enjoy Watching Him Do So. “Will he always take smart shots? Probably not. It will be frustrating at times, for sure. And, at other times, it will be absolutely intoxicating. He gets to the rim, he’s a better passer than anyone gives him credit for, his shoe game is extremely tight, and, in the right situations, he has been efficient.” I think this has played out pretty much exactly like I expected. Yes, he has shot the team out of a couple of games with ill-advised long jumpers early in the shot clock (the recent Golden State game, for instance). But he’s also rescued the team in more than a few fourth quarters. The good definitely outweighs the bad here. Excited to see what he does when/if he gets to return to playoff ball.

This team is going to have a great offense. “Dirk is on the comeback trail, I just said enough about Monta, new point guard Jose Calderon is the quarterback they missed all last season, Shawn Marion gets in where he fits in, and Vince Carter is more like ‘Half Man, Half Ridiculous Shot Selection’ now, but still capable of punch off the bench.” YEP.

And a pretty average (in the best possible scenario) defense. “I don’t look forward to seeing what happens when a team faces a speedy guard who can get to to the basket.” ALSO YEP. Maybe even worse than average, depending.

Have you ever imagined what it would be like if someone merged Erick Dampier and Desagana Diop into one player and then made that player past his prime and a little out of shape? “Congratulations. The Mavs have Samuel Dalembert.” I was wrong-ish about this. Dalembert has had a weird season. He overslept his way out of favor briefly, but he’s been absolutely crucial at other times. I don’t know. Can’t figure it out. He’s definitely an X factor. When he’s on, he’s definitely better than the Dampier/Diop combo platter. You just don’t know when he’ll be on.

Bottom line: “They didn’t upgrade enough to be considered a contender for anything other than a playoff spot. Maybe if everything went absolutely perfect, the team would have an outside shot at the 5th or even the 4th seed. I’m not saying that will happen. That is under pristine laboratory conditions, and even then, there is probably somewhere around a 3 percent chance of that happening. Don’t get your hopes up. I think, most likely, the Mavs finish with 46-47 wins and, let’s say, the 6th seed.” Close. The Mavs, going into tonight’s game against San Antonio, are 48-31 and currently sit in the seventh seed, a half game up on the Phoenix Suns, 1.5 up on the Memphis Grizzlies, and two games behind Golden State in the loss column. The Mavs would have to win out — giving them 51 wins — and Golden State would have to lose the rest of their games for the Mavs to overtake them, taking into account tiebreakers. Don’t see that happening. But 50 wins is a definite possibility. Glad to be wrong here. (I was pretty close though.)


  • zaccrain

    Yeah, the only one that is arguable is Chandler, but honestly, reading quotes from him last year, I don’t think he would have come back to Dallas unless they overpaid him. Which, you could argue, New York did. But it seems to me like he got his championship, and wanted to be in a city like New York for the amount of money a team like the Knicks were willing to pay.

    J.J. would have been ridiculous. And, I think JET’s pride got in the way. He didn’t listen to what his body was telling him, which is that he was basically done. It’s easy for me to argue, “Hey, take less money, retire as a Mav, everything’ll be great.” But if he had done that, I think there is no question he would have has his number retired — he still might — and he would have ended his career as a local legend. Transition into the front office or the coaching staff, or even partnered with Followill on the broadcast team.

  • JSSS

    Maybe it is selective memory, but I recall people being a lot more upset about losing Chandler than Terry and certainly than Barea. No one in his right mind would have paid Barea what the TWolves gave him, and I personally was fine either keeping Terry (assuming a hometown discount) or letting him walk. but they just had to keep Chandler if they had any shot at a repeat.

  • LDR4

    Most of the rumors I’ve heard is that Terry is likely to join the Mavs front office, once he retires, in a situation similar to Michael Finley’s spot. These are just rumors, though, but it wouldn’t be surprising.

  • zaccrain

    I hope so.

  • Ballin

    Is it just me or does listening to Followill make you wanna dig your eyeballs out with a spoon? Any chance they will be replacing him, ever.

    • Mavdog

      Yes, I think it is just you….
      I find our broadcast team to be one of the better one’s. If you have League Pass you get the chance to listen to every broadcast team in the Association, and let me tell you some are pretty poor. The homerism is many times just too much,which I must say is not an issue with the Mavs team.
      They are very professional.